Friday 11 March 2011

TAKE DOWN NOTICE ON SPRITZER ARTICLE



Dear Sir,

We refer to the above wherein we act for Yee Lee Trading Co Sdn.Bhd. It has come to our client' attention that you have published an article namely 'Spritzer Keluarkan Minuman Berperisa Semut,' on your website http://www.sabahkini.net on 9th March 2011. We are instructed that the said Article contains untrue and defamatory statement about our client's product, the SPRITZER mineral water.

TAKE NOTICE that the publication of the said Article had cause our client to suffer damage and loss of reputation in the eyes of the various authorities and their customers. Out client would haves suffered lost substantial business and opportunity to make profits due to the unfounded allegations made in the said Article.

WE HEREBY DEMAND THAT you immediately take down the said Article from your website and that YOU UNDERTAKE FORTHWITH to cease to publish such kind of articles regarding our client and/our client's product thereby jeopardizing our client's reputation.

We are further instructed by our client that you may forward any complaints received regarding our client and/or client's products directly to our client or to use as their solicitors for our client's further action.

We hereby put you on notice that in the event you fail to take down the said Article, we have our client's instructions to commence legal action against you without further notice.

Our client's right are expressly reserved.

Yours Faithfully,

TOH THEAM HOCK & CO

NOTE: SABAHKINI.NET team management only bind to obey the court order not the lawyer or anybody who got interest in this matter for the sake of consumer. Please get Count Injunction to remove article. We also unhappy with Spritzer management who send us email to seek our corporation for the details and looking for the complainer; but at the same time send lawyer notice. With this, we advise SPRITZER to get the Court Injunction before we can tolerate by remove the article.

8 comments:

  1. It may have negative impact towards spritzer's reputation. However, the consumers does have the right to be warned if certain products pose threats to our health.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Saya ada baca artikel SPRITZER KELUARKAN MINUMAN BERPERISA SEMUT? namun takda pula tuduhan dibuat kepada spritzer... Cuma permintaan agar hal tu dipantau.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Apapun, hal ini mmg patut diberi perhatian sewajarnya bagi memastikan semua pihak mengutamakan faktor kebersihan dan mengambil kira kepentingan pengguna yg membeli produk2 dari mana2 syarikat.

    ReplyDelete
  4. perkara ini harus dipantau bagi memastikan kualiti dan kebersihan produk ini.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The public deserve to know about this. Sabihkini.net did the right thing in publishing this story.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hopefully no such case like this will happen again. SPRITZER must ensure the quality and cleanliness of its product.

    ReplyDelete
  7. you should prove that the article contains untrue and defamatory statements about the products. don't because of you want to make money, you are denying the report made by your customer.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ini untuk memberi amaran kepada pengguna lain. Apa salahnya?

    ReplyDelete