Wednesday, 16 March 2011

SABAH NEED NO NUCLEAR PLANT



By: SAPP MEDIA

WITH so much negative publicity generated by the Japanese Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plants in the aftermath of the earth quake and tsunami, it is has become highly unlikely that the Malaysian government will proceed with any final decision to build nuclear power plants for the foreseeable future.

However, we should be concerned about other nuclear plants which are dangerously near to Sabah should a nuclear accident happen. For instance, the Philippines’s Bataan Nuclear Plant near Manila.

This Bataan plant is being mothballed but might be rehabilitated as the Philippines is running out of energy options. There are also several nuclear plants in Guangdong and other parts of Southern China.

At the moment, the Malaysian government has no guidelines on precautions to be taken by citizens in the event of a regional nuclear accident. I doubt whether the authorities and the medical services have the resources, training and disaster management capabilities in tackling radiation risks coming a foreign country.

Japan, China and other countries have little options for their energy needs. That is why they go nuclear. But Malaysia has the Four-Fuel strategy of using oil, hydropower, coal and natural gas. In the case of Sabah, it is very sad that we are still without an energy policy. Oil fuels have become prohibitively expensive, coal has been rejected and hydro power projects are not getting anywhere.

The only viable option left is natural gas. But we are not allowed to use our natural gas because the gas is exported via Bintulu to give billions of ringgit in profit to Petronas. This is economic exploitation, pure and simple.

Natural gas remains our most viable option for the next decade supported by bio-mass, mini-hydros and other sustainable energy sources. But Sabah wasted precious three years debating about the controversial coal power plant.

Without any further delay, the government must commit itself to building a natural gas pipeline from Kinamis to Sandakan. Or else Sabahans will be condemned to suffer electric power shortages and high electric tariffs.

12 comments:

  1. We do not need a nuclear plant. There are plenty of other alternatives available, there is no reason to stick to nuclear plant.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Other country have no choice, but Sabah has many alternatives such as natural gas, solar power, wind turbines and others. Why can't we consider using these methods?

    ReplyDelete
  3. We here in Sabah don't want the nuclear plant. It is too risky.

    ReplyDelete
  4. many source in our country, we no need nuclear plant.

    ReplyDelete
  5. setiap yang dilakukan perlulah dikaji baik dan buruknya terlebih dahulu. sebaiknya jika kita menggunakan sumbertenaga yang bersih dan selamat.

    ReplyDelete
  6. After what had happened in Japan, I think the government should reconsider their decision to build a nuke plant in Malaysia. For now, it's doesn't look like a good idea to go on with this project.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm sure there are better alternatives which will not harm the environment or even the people.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Better govt need to review this suggestion to build the nuke plant.

    ReplyDelete
  9. yes..we need no nuclear plant here..

    ReplyDelete
  10. hope the govt will never approve the nuke plant proposal..

    ReplyDelete
  11. there's lots of other alternatives which is more safer and environment friendly we can use..why must nuke plant?

    ReplyDelete
  12. kerajaan harus membuat kajian lebih mendalam sebelum meluluskan pembinaan loji nuklear kerana kita tidak mahu apa yang menimpa Jepun, sebuah negara maju yang sudah lama menggunakan tenaga nuklear, menimpa Malaysia. jangan kerana terlalu teruja mahu menjadikan negara ini sebuah negara maju, sedangkan kita masih belum mempunyai pakar dalam bidang teknologi nuklear, maka keselamatan dan kesihatan rakyat dipertaruhkan..

    ReplyDelete