KOTA KINABALU: The State
Reform Party suspects that the Barisan Nasional government is trying to gain
political mileage from the Lahad Datu standoff, using it to scare the people
into voting for the BN in the coming general elections.
“It is even possible that
this is an elaborate BN military strategy choreographed to achieve that
purpose,” its state chairman, Datuk Dr. Jeffrey Kitingan said in a statement.
“This new form of fear mongering makes sense knowing BN’s desperation in
wanting to hold on to power in the light of the ruling coalition’s lowest level
of popularity and support at the moment.”
He said the way the tense
situation is handled supports this theory, pointing out to the facts that the
prime minister appears to be not perturbed by the incident and had not made
much effort in explaining the real situation in Lahad Datu in spite of the many
inconsistencies on the information received by the people.
“The numerous rumours of
disturbances like in KK and other areas spreading through social networks like
Facebook add credence to the theory of the intrusion being orchestrated to
frighten the people of Sabah.
“There are international
reports which says the Sulu Sultan recognized by Manila had denied any
involvement in the intrusion into Sabah, or that they are his army, while
another sultan claims Lahad Datu to be his homeland and he and his people
refuse to leave. The news had become an international intrigue while we in
Sabah are still being denied the truth.
“The federal government has
failed to show real seriousness and muscle in dealing with such a problem and
we are becoming a laughing stock under the scrutiny of international
observation,” Jeffrey claimed. “We are talking of an intrusion by military
units in full gear and weapons like M-16, the deadliest gun in army warfare.
Why can’t they treat this as
a flagrant criminal act, a breach of national security and a violation of
Malaysian sovereignty?
“It is shocking that the
government has failed to deal with this security issue effectively and quickly
by taking the appropriate measures on the intruders. What the government had
done is take unconvincing action such as negotiating. By negotiating the government
is giving a lot of legitimacy to the intruders as if they have some sort of
rights when in fact they have none whatsoever to negotiate for in the first
place.”
“By the successful act of
intrusion into Lahad Datu, it shows total failure of Malaysia’s security
apparatus. The government must explain where were the navy, marine police and
its security patrols? Where were the national military intelligence and tip-off
of the impending intrusion or invasion so it could be pre-empted? On the other
hand if it is not a real intrusion, the failings of the security apparatus
shows that it is indeed an orchestrated show and drama because the other
components of a real invasion are missing!
“We can see that the
response of the government is appalling and pathetic. The army, navy and the
whole security apparatus with helicopters, tanks and heavy artillery should
have been called in. Instead, negotiations are carried out by the police on the
so-called no-bloodshed basis. What it was they negotiated about, and why had
the negotiation taken so long? How come it is the police doing the negotiating
and why was the army excluded? Are the police equipped to deal with the
militants who are not normal criminals?
“It’s not amusing that the
story is unfolding to portray the heroic acts of the intruders instead and
making the police and army look weak and indecisive.
“We haven’t heard any report
of the police demanding that they lay down their arms. Why? Is it because the
whole thing is really a scripted dramatic charade to frighten the voters? If
that is the game, it is a double-edged sword because it can backfire and cause
the people to vote against the BN for the obvious failure in flexing military
muscle for the sake of national dignity and sovereignty.
“Another fact that supports
the theory this is a fear mongering tactic is that there is little media
coverage in the government-controlled mass and mainstream media although the
intrusion is bordering on an act of war. Isn't Sabah important enough as Malaysians to deserve being kept posted on
the developments on the standoff? Why leave to private news and internet
portals to carry news about it? Why is there so much rumours of disturbances in
other areas in Sabah but the police is not taking action on the rumour mongers.
Is it because this spreading of rumours is being fired up by cybertroopers?
“The government has proven
itself to be not serious about Sabah's security. If the government can prevent
an Australian senator from coming into KL, there is no reason the government
cannot stop an intrusion by armed militants into Sabah.
In sum, the government has
clearly failed to give us confidence in our security capability or to give us
pride as Malaysians in dealing with an international incidence which has now
tarnished our international reputation.
“If the government cannot
protect our country and deal with this problem in a way that will enhance our
standing as a sovereign nation, maybe it’s time for Malaysia to ask for
international intervention,” Jeffrey said.
No comments:
Post a Comment