By : JOE FERNANDEZ
Hoteliers in Sabah are
grumbling increasingly loudly that tourists are canceling too many bookings in
the wake of the Lahad Datu Standoff and the on-going mopping up operations by
security forces. They worry that things may become a whole lot worse for the
hospitality industry in the state before turning for the better, if at all, in
the near future.
The state has some 25, 000
hotel rooms to help the hospitality industry rake in some RM 5.2 billion last
year from nearly three million visitors. The forecast revenue for 2015,
according to Sabah Tourism Board chairman Tengku Zainal Adlin, is RM 15 billion
on the high side. That amounts to a quarter of the RM 60 billion per annum that
Malaysia presently collects from tourism receipts.
Clearly, the travel industry
is high income lifeblood for the Sabah economy which already suffers the drain
of most of its resources and revenues to Putrajaya. Palm oil and the oil and
gas sectors are other bright spots. Timber is a sunset industry.
Foreign missions in Malaysia,
erring on the side of caution, have reportedly either extended previous Travel
Advisories or issued new ones urging caution if travelling to eastern Sabah.
However, travellers may not
make any distinction between the Sabah east and west coasts. They may not make
any distinction either between Sabah and the rest of Borneo.
They fear being the target
of kidnappings.
Visiting Peninsular
Malaysians uneasy in Kota Kinabalu
The Abu Sayaff, a breakaway
from the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF), has engaged in kidnappings
along the east coast in the past. The victims were only freed after Malaysia,
and also foreign Governments, met the ransom demands of the kidnappers.
Kidnapping is the method
used by Abu Sayyaf to force the Malaysian Government, its sponsor, to pay up
when its funding for operations was delayed. It’s sheer blackmail!
The state and federal
governments are fighting back with a joint RM 500,000 Recovery Fund to
revitalize the travel sector in the wake of Lahad Datu. This sum amounts to
peanuts if kidnappings for ransom resume along the east coast.
In Kota Kinabalu, no one
will get the impression that one is in imminent danger of any kind. Life, limb
and properties are safe.
Still, most visiting
Peninsular Malaysians have long expressed their fears when visiting the Sabah
capital, warily noting the presence of illegal immigrants all around them.
Their perennial question: “How can you people allow this (illegal immigration)
to go on?”
Government must stick
together in security, sovereignty, integrity
It can be said candidly that
the security situation in Sabah, except for the continuing influx of illegal
immigrants, has always been under control. The confidence of the authorities
can be gauged from the fact that there was no reason to declare any special
security zone or command until the decision was made in the wake of Lahad Datu
to set up the Eastern Sabah Security Command (Esscom). Illegal immigrants were
not considered by Putrajaya as a security threat, a point which will be
disputed by Sabahans.
One reason for the otherwise
excellent security in Sabah was the very fact that the nearest trouble spots
were all in the southern Philippines, quite some distance away from the Sabah
mainland. Also, the known involvement of Malaysia directly as a facilitator in
the peace process in southern Philippines, and indirectly as the prime backer
of the rebel forces, “kept Sabah safe”.
Putrajaya has to rethink its
foreign policy and security initiatives with particular reference to the Manila
Government if the troubles in the southern Philippines are not to swamp and
sweep away Sabah in troubles sweeping both sides of the Sulu Sea.
It was naïve on the part of
Putrajaya to defy the United Nations Charter and engage in acts as alleged,
whether overtly or covertly, to compromise the sovereignty and territorial
integrity of a fellow member state of the United Nations. How the Manila
Government deals with its Muslim citizens in the country’s south is no concern
of Malaysia. Governments must stick together even if they are allegedly
mistreating their own citizens.
MNLF cannot be Manila’s sole
partner for peace in southern Philippines
Putrajaya must not also
belabour under the delusion that interfering in southern Philippines is the way
to prevent the so-called Sabah claim being raised or to prevent the secession
of Sabah from the Malaysian Federation. Nur Misuari, the leader of the MNLF,
has already made it clear in recent days that Malaysia is a stumbling block to
lasting peace in the southern Philippines.
The heirs of the defunct
Sulu Sultanate don’t have a leg to stand on in Sabah.
Neither does Malaysia,
points out Nur Misuari.
For the immediate future,
the security threat in Sabah is the resumption of kidnappings along the east
coast by the Abu Sayyaf who are likely to act in concert with the so-called
Royal Sulu Army (RSA). Only the MNLF can restraint both these groups although
its troops were also involved, privately Nur Misuari claims, in the Lahad Datu
Standoff.
In return, Nur Misuari would
want Malaysia for starters out of the southern Philippines. He also wants
Malaysia out of Sabah and Sarawak but that’s another matter and one for the
people of the territories concerned to decide. Misuari’s claim that Sarawak
used to belong to his great great grandfather and that he wants it back does
not hold water. Here, Malaysia will have to rely on the Manila Government to
restrain Nur Misuari.
However, there’s no way that
Manila can restrain Nur Misuari if Malaysia continues to root for the Moro
Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), another MNLF breakaway, as the Philippines
Government’s sole partner for peace in southern Philippines.
Disproportionate flow to
Putrajaya concern of Sabahans
Matters have been compounded
by Manila declaring in recent days that it will pursue the so-called Sabah
claim. It’s known that a Power of Attorney, the sole instrument by which a
previous Sultan of Sulu transferred his “sovereignty” over Sabah to the
Philippines, has since expired.
The decision by Jamalul
Kiram III, the so-called Sultan of Sulu, to send his rag-tag forces into Sabah
in recent weeks apparently followed failed negotiations with Putrajaya to
squeeze more money from Malaysia for Sabah. At present the descendents of the
nine heirs jointly share a measly RM 5,300 per annum from the Malaysian
Government in accordance with a 1939 High Court of Borneo declaration.
Nur Misuari may not be
engaged in the struggle in the southern Philippines and eastern Sabah for
money, unlike Abu Sayyaf and the heirs of the defunct Sulu Sultanate, although
he has admitted being trained, armed and financed in the past by Malaysia. His
covetous reference to the fabulous wealth, resources and revenue of Sabah must
not be taken too seriously. The issue of the disproportionate flow to Putrajaya
is one for Sabahans to resolve.
However, the money factor
involving foreigners must also be removed to ensure longterm peace, stability
and security in Sabah.
The oil and gas platforms
out at sea, the plantations, and timber camps, besides the tourist traffic, all
need to be protected from any even low-key guerrilla warfare which may be waged
in eastern Sabah by the terrorists to exact more money from Malaysia “for
Sabah”.
No comments:
Post a Comment