By
: NILUKSI KOSWANAGE
KUALA
LUMPUR : Malaysia’s divisive election has left a bitter taste for millions of
people that risks creating a long-term problem of legitimacy for Prime Minister
Najib Razak’s long-ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition.
The
outrage was clear at a busy intersection across from one of Kuala Lumpur’s
fanciest shopping malls, where a huge poster of Najib and his deputy had been
defaced — a rare display of public disrespect in the Southeast Asian nation.
One
of the scrawled comments poked fun at the unconvincing share of the votes won
by Najib’s ruling coalition in its May 5 election victory: “47 percent PM,” it
said.
“If
you don’t like it, you can leave,” mocked another, alluding to a comment by
Najib’s new Home Minister that those unhappy with the result — and the
electoral system that produced it — should pack up and emigrate.
The
tense political atmosphere threatens to prolong policy uncertainty that
investors hoped the polls would put to rest, as Najib braces for a possible
leadership challenge and the Opposition mounts a noisy campaign to contest the
result.
By
securing 60 percent of parliamentary seats with less than 50 percent of the
popular vote, the BN’s victory has served to expose starkly the unfairness of a
gerrymandered electoral system that is also prone to cheating and bias.
That
has galvanised the Opposition, led by former Deputy Prime Minister Anwar
Ibrahim, into holding a series of big rallies as it refuses to accept the
result and prepares legal action to challenge the outcome in nearly 30 close-run
seats.
Disgruntled
Malaysians have submitted over 220,000 signatures to the White House online
petition page, exceeding the number required for a response from President
Barack Obama.
In
response, divisions have appeared in the United Malays National Organization
(UMNO), the main party in the ruling coalition — in power since independence
from Britain in 1957.
Hardliners
have urged a crackdown on dissent and blamed minority ethnic Chinese voters for
deserting the ruling coalition. That has raised racial tensions in a country
whose ethnic Malay majority dominates politics and enjoys special privileges to
offset what its leaders see as its disadvantaged position compared to
relatively wealthy ethnic Chinese.
Reformers
have urged Najib to press ahead with social and economic reforms to blunt the
opposition’s appeal and address the concerns of discontented young and urban
voters. That includes many ethnic Malays who voted for the opposition.
“Every
day Najib sees angry Malaysians on the Internet. It is not an easy thing to
swallow,” said a senior government official who declined to be identified.
“There are people in his cabinet asking for a crackdown and there are others
asking for him to brandish his reformist side.”
The
hard liners appeared to gain ground last week when police used the colonial-era
Sedition Act to detain three opposition politicians and activists and charged a
student with inciting unrest.
The
three arrested were later released after a court rejected the Police remand
order, but could still face charges.
Najib
is under pressure from UMNO conservatives such as Mahathir Mohamad, who served
as Prime Minister for 22 years, to show a tougher side ahead of a leadership
election that could be held as early as August. At least until then, planned
reforms such as steps to widen Malaysia’s tax base and reduce heavy food and
fuel subsidies are likely to stay on hold.
“Najib
is not in a very strong position,” Mahathir told reporters in Tokyo on
Saturday, saying there was a risk that his majority could be weakened further
if some ruling coalition politician defected to the opposition.
“When
you are concerned about that, the focus on development, economy and all that
will be affected. That is Najib’s problem.”
Fraud
Claims
The
Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud, but Reuters
interviews with 15 polling agents give an indication of why many Malaysians
have lost faith in an electoral system that clearly favours the governing
coalition.
A
majority said that officials of the Election Commission (EC), which is part of
the Prime Minister’s Department, did not follow procedures or were ill-equipped
to oversee the polls.
“Some,
not all, officials were not trained enough or did not have the experience to
determine what was a spoiled vote,” said a counting agent in the Segamat
parliamentary seat in southern Johor state, where the BN candidate won by a
slim 1,200 majority with 950 votes deemed as spoiled.
“I
cannot speculate on whether it was deliberate but there was quite a bit of
incompetence,” said the agent, who declined to be identified due to the
sensitivity of the issue.
Anwar’s
three-party alliance says it has evidence that BN officials bought votes with
cash and transported immigrants granted citizenship on shaky grounds to vote in
areas with close races.
While
its legal action, due to be filed with courts around the end of May, is
unlikely to succeed, it will keep the electoral fraud issue in the spotlight
for months ahead.
In
Selangor state near Kuala Lumpur, a Reuters examination found at least 2,000
voters had identity cards deemed “dubious” by a commission of inquiry in
Malaysia’s Borneo island state of Sabah. That commission is investigating
longstanding allegations that the ruling coalition handed out citizenship for
votes to immigrants.
The
government denies the fraud claims, accusing the opposition of being sore
losers and of trying to stir up an Arab Spring style revolt. The EC says it
took a tough approach in eradicating possible fraud in the electoral rolls.
“The
Opposition did not lose because of election rigging, it lost because they did
not get the vote,” EC Chairman Abdul Aziz told Reuters.
Deep
concerns over the integrity of Malaysia’s elections are nothing new. The
government has been shaken by huge street rallies in recent years organised by
the influential BERSIH (clean) movement that has called for sweeping reforms,
including a clean-up of the electoral roll and equal access to media.
After
a violent police response to a 2011 rally, Najib burnished his reform
credentials by rolling back some draconian security laws and introducing
limited electoral reforms.
Reform
Dilemma
BERSIH
says those reforms did not go far enough, and is refusing to recognise the
election results until it has verified hundreds of allegations of fraud in a
“people’s tribunal”. It has previously highlighted instances of voters over 120
years of age and hundreds of voters living at a single address.
Likely
far more influential than fraud are electoral boundaries that have been
manipulated over the years to favour the BN. Pro-opposition constituencies in
urban areas have up to nine times the number of voters than pro-government
seats.
The
opposition won just 89 seats in the 222-seat parliament, despite winning more
than 51 percent of the vote.
“Najib
won on malapportionment rather than his policies to eradicate corruption and
reform the economy as voters felt he wasn’t sincere,” said Ooi Kee Beng,
Singapore-based Deputy Director of the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Najib,
the 59-year-old son of a former Prime Minister, is unlikely to countenance
deeper electoral reforms, a move that could be political suicide for the BN.
Reformists
within UMNO are urging him, however, to ignore calls for a security crackdown
and push ahead with steps to tackle corruption and make the ruling coalition
more appealing to urban and ethnic Chinese voters who have deserted it.
“Of
course the debate on whether we are truly a majority government will go on. But
we can gain respect from the people,” said Saifuddin Abdullah, a prominent
reformist who is a member UMNO’s Supreme Council. (REUTERS)
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteIN a democracy, one cannot argue that a party which has lost the election but won the popular vote is the real winner. It is really a question of reality practised in many countries. Don't use popular vote to justify street demonstrations.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteUntil today, we have yet to see any strong evidence of electoral fraud as claimed by the opposition. Let us look at this often quoted argument by the opposition that "we won by popular vote".
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteFrom the ideology and policy direction, Barisan Nasional component parties have one direction in wanting to run the country and all respect the Federal Constitution. As for the opposition, there are four parties bound with one aim -- to topple the government.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteThe position of its respective parties appears to be focused on taking Putrajaya, but then the country may end up like in Iraq. The war against former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was won by the allied forces, but without any solution for the country after the takeover.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteThe opposition's individual ideology and policy directions have stark differences -- one wants hudud while the other says "over my dead body" and everyone must be equal; there is one which says so and so must become prime minister; and one which subscribes to a socialist style of government.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteWere the voters put in a state of dilemma or was it a case of "let's bring down the BN government and talk later how to govern the country"? In a democracy, the voters must be given clear information as to what will happen to the country if the opposition wins. This element of decisiveness was missing and yet the popular vote argument is used as the basis for demonstrations.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteThere is no guarantee that in a democracy, popular vote can give the coveted prize of taking over the government. The argument used by the opposition pact that it won by popular vote cannot be sustained. Let us get on with our lives to develop the economy and wellbeing of the nation.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteCONGRATULATIONS Datuk Seri Najib Razak for leading Barisan Nasional to victory at the 13th General Election. His 1Malaysia is by far the best programme initiated by a prime minister. In the present world where the majority always undermine, oppress, manipulate and "kill" the minority, we have a leader from the majority promoting 1Malaysia where everyone can live as one nation. And for this, Malaysians must give him their full support.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteDuring the run-up to the polls, it seemed that everyone was being taken for a ride. First, the opposition leader appeared to be taking the Malays for a ride when he promised them he would be the next prime minister and will guide them to glory.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteThank God after two general elections, the majority of the Malays did not believe him and still don't. At the 13th General Election, he again took them for a ride, when he convinced them it was okay to hold hands with DAP even if DAP questioned Malay rights and their religion openly in public.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteHe then took DAP and Pas for a ride saying that he had the support of the Malays to form the next government. DAP was then told to go and get the Chinese votes by whatever means. DAP took the Chinese voters for a ride by telling them the current government was corrupt and Pakatan was the only party in the world which was corrupt-free.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteThe majority of the Chinese also took BN and MCA for a ride. They graciously accepted all the money that was given to them through free dinners and government incentives, but voted for DAP. In Penang, there were billboards telling the Chinese to take whatever that was given to them, but give their votes to DAP. Just imagine what DAP has taught and preached the people and their young, to "bite the hand that feeds you".
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteBN should take a good look at this scenario and review all the aid given to the people, especially those who voted against the coalition. And now that the polls are over, Pakatan is still trying to take Malaysians for a ride by claiming that the election process and results was fraudulent.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteThey alleged that some 40,000 Bangladeshis were brought in to vote. But until today, their watchdogs only managed to catch 15 Bangladeshis, who were on their way to work, two Indians and a Malaysian who happened to look like a Bangladeshi. The funny thing is, this "Bangladeshi" was a PKR supporter.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteI'm wondering, now that the 40,000 Bangladeshi landed in Malaysia, what if Pakatan gave them their usual high energy talks and converted them to vote for Pakatan like they did with the Chinese. Hence, the overwhelming wins in the urban areas.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteIt sounds absurb, but there are people naive enough to believe it. Pakatan is still at it -- trying to take Malaysians for another ride by requesting them to wear black to protest against the results.
The Opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud
ReplyDeleteThe mother of all rides is yet to come. The PKR number two leader has openly blasted the opposition leader and his wife. He also said he knew "secrets" about the leader which he had kept for 15 years. He should reveal the "secrets" to the public.
PKR perlu tengok cermin, henti salah menyalahkan
ReplyDeleteMahu tidak mahu PKR harus mengakui bahawa parti itu telah mencatat rekod buruk dalam pilihan raya umum (PRU) lalu berbanding PAS dan DAP sebagai rakan di dalam Pakatan Rakyat.
Meskipun bertanding paling banyak kerusi di peringkat Parlimen iaitu 99 kerusi, tapi PKR hanya menang 30 kerusi Parlimen. Kalah hampir 70 kerusi yang lain.
Kini PKR bukan lagi parti yang menguasai kerusi dalam barisan pembangkang di Dewan Rakyat. Ia perlu melukut di tepi gantang dan mendapat belas ihsan khususnya DAP yang memenangi 38 kerusi Parlimen.
PAS meskipun hanya mempunyai 21 kerusi Parlimen di dalam Dewan Rakyat, tetapi PAS menguasai jumlah kerusi yang besar di peringkat Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) dengan jumlah keseluruhan 85 kerusi DUN.
Begitu juga DAP yang mempunyai 95 kerusi DUN di seluruh negara. PKR pula jauh ketinggalan iaitu dengan hanya mempunyai 49 kerusi DUN.
Agak menghairankan apabila Ketua Umum PKR, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim dianggap sebagai "pimpinan utama" Pakatan sebenarnya terpaksa bergantung kekuatannya kepada PAS, bahkan kepada DAP.
Partinya sendiri menjadi parti yang lemah dalam gabungan Pakatan.
Apabila keputusan PRU mendapati BN berjaya mendapat mandat untuk menubuhkan kerajaan, Anwar segera membuat sidang media di sebuah hotel ternama di Kuala Lumpur.
Apa yang berlaku malam itu, Anwar menayangkan sebuah video kononnya seorang pengundi hantu ditangkap.
PKR perlu tengok cermin, henti salah menyalahkan
ReplyDeleteVideo berkenaan bukanlah unik dan hanya diambil daripada sebuah Facebook yang mana sudah ramai orang mengetahui keadaan itu lebih awal, termasuklah para media.
Dalam keadaan yang kelihatan tergesa-gesa, Anwar bersama beberapa orangnya pun mengumumkan untuk mengadakan perhimpunan yang dinamakan "Blackout 505".
Dia perlu membuat perhimpunan itu segera dan secara bersiri untuk menutup kelemahannya yang gagal dalam misi menawan Putrajaya.
Anwar pun meletakkan seluruh kesalahan dan cuba untuk mengambing-hitamkan Suruhajaya Pilihan Raya (SPR).
Langkah untuk mengadakan siri perhimpunan "Blackout 505" itu tidak pula mendapat sokongan penuh daripada rakan-rakan pimpinan tertinggi PAS dan DAP.
Ramai yang mula menyedari bahawa siri perhimpunan itu hanya untuk menutup kelemahan Anwar dan Pakatan secara umumnya di mata rakyat jelata.
PKR perlu tengok cermin, henti salah menyalahkan
ReplyDeleteKetika menyertai pilihan raya, Pakatan dan PKR khususnya dilihat terlalu yakin atau over confident.
Di mana-mana sahaja, Anwar menyanyikan lagu: "Tanya sama Najib, apa sebab goyang?"
Ini bertujuan mengejek BN yang didakwa akan kehilangan Sabah. Di saat-saat genting itulah, kesepakatan Pakatan rupa-rupanya rapuh apabila banyak tempat berlaku pula pertembungan sesama sendiri.
Hal berkenaan sedikit sebanyak digunakan BN sebagai bahan kempen demi menjejaskan peluang Pakatan di mata para pengundi seluruh negara.
Mungkin kerana terlalu yakin dan gemar menyanyi lagu mengejek di ceramah-ceramah, maka Anwar terlupa untuk mengikat kesepakatan yang kuat di kalangan parti-parti dalam Pakatan sendiri.
Kata-kata manis Anwar dan Timbalan Presiden, Azmin Ali yang kononnya pembahagian kerusi sesama Pakatan "sudah selesai" hanya kata-kata politik sahaja.
Begitu juga di mana sepanjang lebih setahun Anwar aktif berkempen ke seluruh negara sebelum pilihan raya, Presiden PAS, Hadi Awang dan Penasihat DAP, Lim Kit Siang dilihat asyik goyang kaki dan tidak banyak membantu Anwar dan Pakatan.
DAP dan PAS hanya menunggu untuk menuai hasil daripada apa yang disemai oleh Anwar dan PKR.
Di kalangan pemimpin PKR dan aktivisnya, sikap DAP dan PAS yang suka memanipulasi mood rakyat yang diciptakan Anwar itu sudah lama terasa.
PKR perlu tengok cermin, henti salah menyalahkan
ReplyDeleteBahkan pembahagian kerusi di peringkat DUN yang cuba dibolot PAS dan DAP di "kawasan pengundi Cina" juga menjadi rungutan ramai pemimpin PKR peringkat bawah yang tak dipedulikan pimpinan tertinggi PKR.
Akibat terlalu yakin, mungkin dirasakan kalau diletakkan calon "selipar Jepun" sekalipun maka PKR boleh menang.
Di ketika PAS dan DAP cuba menangguk di air keruh dan memanipulasi keadaan, Anwar pula bukan terfokus untuk memperkukuh partinya sendiri.
Sejak pemilihan tiga tahun lalu, beliau nampaknya dalam diam-diam lebih berminat untuk menyiapkan sarana untuk anak perempuannya, Nurul Izzah Anwar agar lebih kukuh dalam PKR.
Semua muka-muka baru yang dilantik adalah orang-orang yang boleh tunduk dan bekerjasama dengan Nurul Izzah.
PKR perlu tengok cermin, henti salah menyalahkan
ReplyDeleteNama seperti Ketua Biro Komunikasi PKR, Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad sehingga naib presiden paling muda, N Surendran adalah orang-orang Nurul Izzah. Itu belum termasuk Rafizi Ramli dan ahli Parlimen Kelana Jaya, Wong Cheng yang dilihat dapat "diikat" untuk berada bawah kem Nurul Izzah.
Semua mereka ini kini memegang jawatan penting di peringkat pusat. Begitu juga anak saudara Anwar sendiri, Chegubard yang akhirnya dapat menjadi calon di DUN Sungai Acheh di Pulau Pinang dengan lari daripada kerusi asalnya di Rembau, Negeri Sembilan.
Tanpa pertandingan tiga penjuru di DUN Sungai Acheh sekalipun, Chegubard tetap kalah.
Mengatur buah politik secara senyap-senyap yang dilakukan ini sangat buruk kepada PKR sebagai sebuah "parti masa depan" seperti yang selalu dilaungkan Anwar.
PKR seharusnya tak meniru parti-parti lain seperti Umno, MCA bahkan DAP yang sudah terikat dengan amalan nepotisme. Nampaknya hampir semua parti politik di Malaysia kini dilanda penyakit politik anak-beranak.
Parti politik bukan milik individu. Umno bukan milik keluarga Najib Razak, Mahathir Mohamad mahupun Abdullah Badawi.
Begitu juga PAS bukan 'syarikat' milik Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat mahupun Hadi. DAP pula bukan milik keluarga Kit Siang atau Karpal Singh. Begitu jugalah PKR bukan milik keluarga Anwar.
Kesempatan dan sumber dana yang diperoleh oleh PKR yang mengemudi kerajaan Selangor selama lima tahun lalu gagal digunakan sepenuhnya untuk membantu negeri-negeri lain dalam usaha untuk menawan Putrajaya.
PKR perlu tengok cermin, henti salah menyalahkan
ReplyDeleteRamai orang tahu Menteri Besar Selangor, Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim dan setiausaha politiknya, Faekah Husin dilihat mempunyai hubungan rapat dengan presiden PKR.
Tahun lalu Khalid menyediakan dana jutaan ringgit yang diberi nama "Geran Selangorku" yang mana dipengerusikan oleh Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail sendiri.
Sejak itu juga Anwar sudah tak mengungkit-ungkit lagi elaun seringgit yang diberikan kepadanya sebagai penasihat ekonomi kerajaan Selangor.
Apabila fokus kepada rakyat terpesong dan mula ada yang membuat kem anak-beranak di dalam parti, maka Allah juga mempunyai rancangannya sendiri. Siapakah yang sebenarnya perlu dipersalahkan apabila Pakatan gagal ke Putrajaya?
Keputusan pilihan raya umum lalu tentu ada hikmah yang tersembunyi dan memikirkan apa yang tidak kena dengan barisan pimpinan tertinggi PKR yang ada sekarang.
Di kebanyakan negara Eropah, seseorang boleh menyatakan apa saja. Semuanya kerana menjunjung prinsip dan falsafah kebebasan bersuara. Lantas mereka mengeluarkan kenyataan yang menghina Islam, tetapi dibenarkan dan pertahankan atas alasan prinsip itu.
ReplyDeleteAtas nama kebebasan bersuara juga sebuah media di Eropah menyiarkan karikatur menghina Nabi Muhammad SAW. Serta-merta berpuluh akhbar lain mengikut jejak menyiarkan karikatur itu dan tindakan mereka dipertahankan atas nama kebebasan bersuara.
ReplyDeleteBegitu juga atas nama kebebasan bersuara, seseorang itu berhak menafikan apa saja. Negara Barat mempertahankan tindakan itu atas nama kebebasan bersuara. Mereka boleh menafikan kandungan Bible mereka. Mereka juga berhak menafikan kandungan al-Quran. Malah, mereka berhak menghina dan memperlekehkan al-Quran. Semua itu atas nama kebebasan bersuara ala Barat.
ReplyDeleteKebebasan bersuara bagi pembangkang adalah bersuara menyatakan sokongan kepada mereka. Jika seseorang menyatakan sokongan kepada pemerintah (atau bersifat kritikal terhadap pembangkang), itu bukan kebebasan bersuara, tetapi menjadi ‘pengkhianat’ atau sudah dibeli oleh parti memerintah”
ReplyDeleteBagaimanapun sesiapa yang menafikan peristiwa holocaust ciptaan pemimpin Nazi Jerman, Adolf Hitler ketika Perang Dunia II, dia berdepan hukuman penjara kerana perbuatan menafikan holocaust adalah perbuatan jenayah di banyak negara Eropah.
ReplyDeleteRupa-rupanya kebebasan bersuara dan kebebasan akhbar di negara Barat juga terhad. Bukan setakat terhad, mereka yang melanggarnya boleh dipenjarakan.
ReplyDeleteSesetengah mereka yang memperjuangkan kebebasan bersuara di Malaysia nampaknya membawa acuan kebebasan bersuara ala Barat ke Malaysia. Dalam keadaan sekarang, mereka yang menyatakan sokongan kepada Najib atau kerajaan akan dilontarkan dengan tohmahan, sindiran, malah maki hamun.
ReplyDelete