By : MOHD JEFRI
RADIUS
IT is still fresh in the
memories of many living Sabahans in the Interior that the unveiling ceremony of
The Constitution Memorial Oath Stone (Keningau Batu Sumpah) within the compound
of former Keningau District Office, on Sept 16th,1964 was officiated by the
Federal Minister of Labour V Manickavasagam and witnessed by the State’s First
Chief Minister Donald Stephens, President of United Kadazan Organisation
(UNKO), OKK Sundang Gunsanad together with other Community leaders and
traditional Native Chiefs hailing from every nook and corner of the Interior
Residency which engross an area of 18,298 km2 (Beaufort, Nabawan, Keningau,
Kuala Penyu, Sipitang, Tenom and Tambunan)
A traditional priest known
as 'Babalian' was engaged to conduct a spiritual ritual at the site involving
an animal sacrifice to bind the guarantees set in the stone, base on the Muruts
communal belief.
The Megalithic Stone
Monument is still intact until today, with it plaque and inscriptions in Malay
Language used during the era of pre-1972 Spelling Reform and the translation reads
“Point One - Freedom of Religion in Sabah; Point Two - The Government of Sabah
Holds Authority over Land in Sabah and Point Three - Native Customs and
Tradition Will Be Respected and Upheld by the Government. In return the People
of Sabah’s Interior pledges Loyalty to the Government of Malaysia.”
The Keningau Oath Stone was
specially erected based on the initiative made by the North Borneo Legislative Council’s
Opposition Leader OKK G.S Sundang, the President of The United Pasok
Nunukragang National Organisation, for the specific purpose of commemorating
the terms in which the former British Crown Colony of North Borneo had joined
hands with former Colony of Sarawak and other states of the Federation of Malaya
to form a new Nation known as 'Malaysia' or “to erect an Oath Stone summarizing
the guarantees given by the Malaysian Government to Sabah, while reiterating
the loyalty of the people of the Interior.“
Former Berjaya Assemblyman
for Bingkor Datuk Ayub Aman (picture), who has some knowledge of the chronology leading
to the birth of the 20 Points, was quoted as saying in a recent interview, “The
late OKK Sedomon Gunsanad had discussed a couple of proposal with Malaysia’s
Deputy Prime Minister Late Tun Abdul Razak’s, during his maiden and sojourn to
the historical Rumah Besar (Big House) located in Bingkor about 10 km from
Keningau way back in 1962.
Razak had brought the message
for the people of Sabah (then North Borneo) of the prospects and potential in
store for them if Sabah joined Malaysia. The event was hosted by Sedomon in the
presence of about 5,000 people coming from many districts within the Interior.
OKK Sedomon Gunsanad, the
Chieftain for the Interior Residency at that time, had earlier thought of a plan
to achieve self – government status quo, prior to joining Malaysia, the concept
which later turned out to be a reality, thus leaving him with the choice of supporting
the prospective idea of incepting a new country, ON CONDITION that the right of the people particularly
the Natives must be protected or safeguarded.
The inscriptions of the Oath
Stone (Batu Sumpah) constituted Sedomon’s vision, identical to those being discussed
at the Rumah Besar appended as follows :-
Firstly, the Natives in the
Interior must be given the Liberty to determine their social belief in other words
the Choice on Freedom of Religion is an individual right.
Secondly, the Rights of
Sabahans to participate in the aspect of socio-economic prospects in the State
e.g Jobs and Business opportunities etc must be protected, thereby brush aside
worries that the influx of educated people from the Peninsular would gradually
deprive Sabahans of such economic prospects.
Thirdly, the ownership of Land within the State.
During the brief historic
meeting, Razak gave his thumb up with a 'Green Light and a Positive Nod' to
Sedomon’s Three Conditions right on the spot at the balcony of the Rumah Besar.
He said “If that is the case, People from the Peninsular would require a
Passport to enter Sabah.“
Sedomon was optimistic that
the conditions which he had forwarded and discussed with Razak, would only need
an official endorsement from Tengku Abdul Rahman Putra Al-Haj, the First Prime
Minister of Malaysia cum The Father of
the Nation’s Independence, as the final step before Sabah could be
declared as part of the Federation of Malaysia officially.
Upon sensing these possible
angles OKK Sedomon Gunsanad was even more confident, thus prompting him to
convince his younger brother OKK Datuk G.S Sundang to support the Concept of the Malaysia
Incorporation instead of objecting the idea stiffly.
It could not therefore be
disputed that three of the initiatives which were later incorporated as part of
the 20 Points of the 1963 Malaysia Agreement – Namely Point 1 - The Freedom of
Religion, Point 6 - Immigration and Point 20 – Land, Forest, Local Government
etc. in the descending order of the agreement in question, was mooted by OKK
Sedomon Gunsanad.
His roles along with the
others during the pre-independence days should have been clearly defined in the
chapter of our State’s political history.
Subsequently, both brothers
Sedomon and Sundang were invited to Peninsular to see for themselves, the
success and the effectiveness of the Alliance Administration, which worked
based on the Concept of the Power Sharing Formula led by the majority Malays in
UMNO, to work hands in hands together with the Chinese and Indians leaders in MCA
and MIC respectively, to further convince these Sabahan leaders with the
impressions that the Malays did not control everything despite their numbers in
the alliance.
The fact is similar
administrative political system was introduced by late Tun Razak Hussein, upon
taking over the roles as the Nation’s second Premier from Tengku. The Power
Sharing Concept has since been used by the current BN Government with outstanding
results, to run the country since the dawn of Independence. There goes the
narration as told by Ayub.
It is worth recollecting
that during the era of USNO led Alliance State Administration, the voice of
doubt to question the status quo of the 20 Points Malaysia Agreement was never
heard of, thereby giving us the impression that there was no doubt, a
co-existence of harmonious State – Federal relationships at that time.
Over the years, it is just
natural that the political maturity of our new generation in the Interior begun
to look back or trace the roots of the State’s political history to get some answers
to their curiosity on matters related to the 20 Points which was an integral part
and parcel of the foundation leading to the creation of the nation called 'Malaysia'.
Perhaps, it may not be wrong
for us to assume that controversies over the issues was beginning to be heard at
the height of PBS State Administration in mid-80s especially when it opted to
stay put outside the Coalition Front and aligned with Opposition Semangat 46 led
by Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah in early 90s. Since then, the frequencies that speak
volume about this specific issue has continued to this days.
Lately, the issue has been
raised quite a number of time by both Opposition and the Ruling Reps turning it
into a popular headlines both in the press media and online news portal.
The State Assembly Speaker
Datuk Seri Salleh Tun Said raffled the feathers when he said “20 Points no longer
valid“, giving the reasons that it is already part of the Malaysian
Constitution, which drew instant reaction from BN-MP for Kota Marudu Datuk
Seri Panglima Dr Maximus Ongkili slamming Salleh that the 20 Points Malaysia
Agreement is “forever valid”.
Someone even thought of an
idea to turn the issue into something more attractive and interesting as speculation
of the 13th GE is rife via bringing it to stage for a public debate.
The Yayasan Islam Sabah Secretary
General, OKK Yahya Ahmad Shah who tipped such a challenged to Science,
Technology and Innovation Minister, Datuk Seri Panglima Dr Maximus Ongkili and
Deputy Housing and Local Government Minister Datuk Seri Lajim Ukim for a battle
of the wits on the 20 points is another interesting example (Borneo Post May 30th , 2012)
The 20 Points Malaysia
Agreement involved legal matters perhaps the common people who may need someone
with the legal expertise to make them fully understand what the debaters raise
in the event the debate takes place.
Recently, the State former Archives
Director Datuk Datu Tiga Belas Datu Zainal Abidin raised another controversies
when he made statement which reads “It should be clarified that the 'Twenty Points' document was just a memorandum of
conditions and not an actual agreement that was signed during the formation of
Malaysia (The Malaysia Today Tuesday 12th June, 2012)
The erection of the Oath
Stone in question has a special purpose to serve. To say that the 20 Points are
no longer valid is liken to add salt to
an injury, so to speak and appears as an insult to the Soul and Spirit of those
who had vested hard effort to turn their Visions and Missions into reality.
Generally, the inscription
of the Three Points on the Keningau Oath Stone which formed part of 20 Points
1963 Malaysia Agreement is a symbolic and authentic source of material testimony
and reference, for the people of all ages to understand the primary objectives
of its erection despite its simplicity.
Let it be there in its
physical status quo for two purposes
:-
Firstly, to mark
symbolically the unity of the local indigenous, who had rallied behind our past leaders including OKK Sedomon Gunsanad and his
brother Datuk G.S Sundang in the Interior
Residency, to render solid and full support for the creation of a new nation known
as Malaysia, following Razak‘s fruitful mission and sojourn to the Rumah Besar in
meeting with several community leaders and people from all walks of life hailing
from every nook and corner of the hinterland
about five decades ago.
Secondly, the Oath Stone is
a historic monument located in Keningau town, which has benefited a quantum of
rapid socio-economic development in the Interior under UMNO led BN State
Administration led by CM Datuk Seri Musa Aman, for our present and future One
Malaysia Generation in the country to see, visit, photograph or film until the
end of time.
apa yang terkandung dalam batu bersumpah tersebut harus dilaksanakan.
ReplyDeleteInilah yang membuktikan perjanjian Sabah Malaysia tercatat dibatu bersurat ini yang masih bertahan sehingga sekarang.
ReplyDeleteAdakah ia akan dipertahankan atau berakhir begitu saja?
ReplyDeleteBatu bersumpah perlu dipertahankan. Sejarah perlu dikekalkan.
DeletePemerhati...Sudah semestinya ini akan terus dipertahankan. Tidak akan dibiarkan ditinggalkan dan dilupakan mengenai perkara ini.
ReplyDeleteTiada siapa yang boleh ubah sejarah.
ReplyDeletebanyak pula isu 20 perkara ni sekarang.. tapi ceritanya sama saja.. cuma yang bercakap itu saja lain2.. kalau betul2 mahu jadi hero, bawa la perkara ini ke mahkamah antarabangsa..
ReplyDelete