By : QUEVILLE TO (FMT)
TAWAU: The federal and the
state Barisan Nasional governments have been urged to make their stand clear on
the issue of the 20-point agreement which underpinned the pact to form Malaysia
in 1963 together with Sarawak, Singapore and Malaya.
MP for Tawau, Chua Soon Bui,
said that a clarification on the issue was appropriate following a controversial
statement by State Legislative Assembly Speaker Salleh Keruak recently that the
agreement guaranteeing Sabah’s special rights after the formation of Malaysia,
was no longer valid as such safeguards are already part of the Federal
Constitution.
Chua, who is also
vice-president of Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP), said the relevance of the
20-point agreement was highlighted in the High Court ruling over the
Borneonisation suit on May 25, when judge David Wong Dak Wah dismissed the
application by both the federal and state governments to strike out a suit
filed by two Sabahans.
“Since the judge ruled that
the suit and the claim are not frivolous, the relevance of the 20-point
agreement is also clearly indicated,” she said.
Chua said Salleh’s statement
came as a shock as both the 20-point agreement for Sabah and the 18-point
agreement for Sarawak are internationally-acknowledged multiparty agreements
which cannot be unilaterally violated by the federal government.
She contended that although
only parts of the 20-point agreement were legally binding when they were
incorporated in the constitution, it did not mean that the 20-point agreement
was invalid or irreverent.
“Although the 20-point
agreement is not binding in totality, the Sabah state government has the right
to demand its full restoration instead of voluntarily surrendering such rights,
as suggested by the Speaker.
“It is high time the federal
government reassured such rights in their original form to Sabah and Sarawak,”
she said.
Comprehensive agreement
She also questioned the
rationale and motive behind Salleh’s statement which meant relinquishing the
rights fought for by the previous Sabah leaders.
“We should be thankful to
our former state leaders for wisely moulding such a comprehensive agreement to
safeguard the rights and interests of the people of Sabah for many generations
to come and not simply discard them as Salleh seemed to have done,” she said.
Former police inspector
Bernard Fung Fon Chen, 70, and former teacher Mohd Nazib Maidan Dally, 35,
filed the suit last year seeking a declaration from the court that the federal
and state governments had “failed and/or neglected to expeditiously and fully
carry out the Borneonisation of the federal public service in the state”.
Last Saturday, Salleh told a
gathering that the 20-point agreement that paved the way for the then British
North Borneo colony to join in the formation of Malaysia in 1963 was no longer
valid as much of it was already incorporated in the Federal Constitution.
An investigation on the Sabah leaders' statement regarding the 20 points agreement should be made to clarify the actual status of the agreement, is it still valid or not?
ReplyDeleteThe Sabah CM said that both Salleh and Dompok is right in their statement but its not the time to determine who is right and who is wrong.
ReplyDeletesemua pihak harus didedahkan mengenai perkara 20 agar mereka faham dan tidak timbul kekeliruan.
ReplyDeleteAdakah isu 20 Perkara ini sengaja dihangatkan untuk kelirukan rakyat?
ReplyDeletePerjuangan 20 perkara harus diteruskan.
ReplyDeleteKerajaan negeri harus memperjuangkan untuk semua rakyat. Kami berhak tahu apa yang berlaku semasa pembentukan Malaysia.
ReplyDeleteIsu 20 perkara ini akan dibincangkan dengan lebih terperinci nanti. Maka kita tunggu apa perkembangkang seterusnya mengenai perkara ini.
ReplyDeleteLebih baik jangan kelirukan rakyat dengan 20 points.
DeleteDia ni bersuara untuk survival politik dia saja.
ReplyDeletekalau pemimpin2 SAPP yang bercakap pasal 20 perkara, baik jangan percaya la.. dulu masa berjuang dalam BN, semua diam, bila sudah jadi pembangkang, barulah banyak cakap..
ReplyDeleteThe content and spirit of the 20 points document on Sabah’s safeguards for the formation of Malaysia is forever valid and relevant by virtue of them being incorporated in the Inter-Governmental Committee (IGC) report and Federal Constitution, opines Science, Technology and Innovation Minister Datuk Seri Dr Maximus Ongkili.
ReplyDeleteThe Kota Marudu MP said the 20 points made in a memorandum by seven political parties in 1962 and submitted to the IGC was not an official government document but purely a political memorandum.
ReplyDeleteHowever, what became official were the deliberations and adoption of the points by the IGC and their eventual incorporation into the Malaysia Agreement and Federal Constitution," he said at Pesta Kaamatan celebration in Kpg Timbang Batu.
ReplyDeleteHowever, Ongkili also pointed out that there were now less than 10 matters in the original 20 points that remained relevant.
ReplyDeleteThe rest especially those provisions pertaining to finance, language, religion and education have been willingly surrendered by previous government leaders of Sabah to the federal government, or they (the points) had lapsed due to time relevance.
ReplyDeleteTherefore, when we talk about the 20 points today we need to be specific about which particular points we are referring to.
ReplyDeleteTherefore, when we talk about the 20 points today we need to be specific about which particular points we are referring to.
ReplyDeleteKeep in mind Point number 4 of the 20 Points which stated that there will be no secession from the Federation. This makes Malaysia a permanent marriage.
ReplyDeleteSo we should be talking about strengthening the Federation and enhancing territorial integration because these were the political commitment of the Sabah founding leaders of the Federation.
ReplyDeleteHe said: “Today Sabah politicians, mainly the opposition, talk only of damning and criticising the federation and federal leaders but say little about building the nation and making Malaysia an even better place for our children"
ReplyDeleteOngkili, who is Parti Bersatu Sabah deputy president, added that PBS would continue to fight for whatever remaining points to preserve them as well as towards enhancing their validity.
ReplyDelete“So, the best way to defend the points is to ensure Barisan Nasional continues to rule Sabah,” said Ongkili who also attended the Mukim Ranau level and Kg Manggaris Pesta Kaamatan celebrations.
ReplyDelete“So, the best way to defend the points is to ensure Barisan Nasional continues to rule Sabah,” said Ongkili who also attended the Mukim Ranau level and Kg Manggaris Pesta Kaamatan celebrations.
ReplyDeleteOngkili, who is Parti Bersatu Sabah deputy president, added that PBS would continue to fight for whatever remaining points to preserve them as well as towards enhancing their validity.
ReplyDelete