THE PROJECTS under taken by
the Federal Ministry of Rural Development and Federal Territories in Sabah are
with slow progress. There is so many works to be carried out and to be
completed.
Just as an example, the
works set out by this ministry which were approved and started since 2011 and
suppose to be completed by 2012 were not completed. In Kota Belud for example
there are 49 projects under the Project Bekalan Air Luar Bandar (BALB) with a
cost of RM104.76 millions to benefit 6,786 houses.
For the rural road
development under JALB in Sabah, there is an allocation of RM2.0 billions to
build 180 rural roads which added up to 1,036 KM. In Kota Belud district a sum
of RM100.76 million was allotted to build 9 rural roads with a total length of
54.93 KM.
The above mentioned development
projects, some had not started, some are under construction and some are still
under “negotiation”. It is surprise to learn that until today we still find the
work proposed by the Federal Ministry of Rural Development are falling behind
schedule, and it will be interesting to know the actual progress of these
projects.
Big sums of money had been
allocated but we see not much progress, thus this remains as “empty promises”,
and the wait of the people to receive the much needed utility services and roads
continue.
The money allocated has not
been spent effectively and fully, the end sufferers are the people in Sabah.
The people lost their chances to enjoy better utilities and road improvement
and they continue to suffer.
This situation is proven and
seen in many rural areas in Sabah where we still have no water and electricity.
The bad kampong roads and some areas still without roads linking to the towns
are common sights. We wonder how much of the RM2.0 billion promised sum to
build roads in the rural districts had been spent and how many kilometers of
these roads were built and ready for traffic.
These projects were not
tendered out but merely awarded through “closed door negotiations” as stated in
the Ministry reply to a question asked in the Parliament. The word
“negotiation” has brought implication as far as the execution of the projects.
For one, the contractors may not be qualified, no experiences, 'Ali Baba' type
- without even a 'changkul' or spanners and screw driver.
How can the government award
the contract to build a million Ringgits road in the kampongs. This situation
will be worst when the politicians, the main contractor, the sub-contractor,
the sub sub-contractor took and sucked away at least 45% of the total contract
sum for doing nothing, and left the last person on the line to do all the
donkey work to make the money for them.
The work is usually
abandoned when the last contractor can not sustained the heavy burden to dish
out the money from the projects to feed them. Is this a fair game and a good
way to execute and implement the projects? (DAP Media)
No comments:
Post a Comment