By : DATUK ABDUL RAHMAN
DAHLAN
TIME and again, we have
listened to the opposition's over the top vitriol on two very emotive issues to
Sabahans; the promise of 15% increase in oil royalty to Sabah and the
allegation of federal government taking away all Sabah resources and in return,
giving almost nothing back to Sabah. These issues must be answered factually
and timely to prevent anyone from being deceived into emotional shadow boxing
by the opposition.
Let's start with the 15%
increase in oil royalty issue. While on the surface it sounds quite appealing,
there are serious concerns over the mechanics needed to bring the notion to
fruition. Making promises is one thing; executing them is another thing all
together.
AN OVERVIEW
The petroleum business is
not a business arrangement for the Average Joe. The capital outlay, technical
challenges and financial risks are so great and prohibitive that only the
companies which have specialized expertise and bottomless bank accounts
normally dare enough to go into it.
Imagine trying to lower drilling
pipes, 4.5km from the sea level, in an intensely-pressurized environment to
search for the elusive black gold. It requires special and extremely expensive
equipment and expertise which only the world’s oil major players (the likes of
Shell, Murphy Oil, ExxonMobil, etc) possess. The cost of exploration drilling
could run into hundreds of millions of dollars which would go to absolute waste
should no oil be found in vicinity of choice.
The nation’s oil company,
Petronas, like her counterparts in other
developing countries (Indonesia, Venezuela and Nigeria etc), does not
have the capacity to absorb the financial risk mentioned above.
It is not financially
equipped to spend billions on research and development and take on the
financial risks in the exploration and production phases when the same billions
are very much needed to be spent on the country’s development.
In addition, unlike Petronas
- which primarily operates within Malaysia’s waters - the oil majors enjoy economies of scale. They operate all
over the world which helps to defray the costs of R&D, the exploration and
production phases.
In the event that oil is
actually discovered, the capital that needs to be spent in the subsequent
phases is even more substantial. It is reportedly said that the cost of the oil
production phase could reach as much as RM2 billion. Sometimes even more.
To cushion such
uncertainties and spread the financial risk, Petronas enters into a
joint-venture agreement (known in the industry as Production Sharing Contract
or PSC and later, a variant called RSCs or Risk Sharing Contracts) with
multinational oil companies like Shell, Murphy Oil or ExxonMobil and others.
These giant oil companies
are given a percentage of the oil revenue generated in return of them bearing
the financial risk and sharing technologies worth billions in Research &
Development.
PETRONAS TAKES ALL?
The opposition always paint
the perception that Petronas has been unfairly profiting from Sabah’s oil
revenue, so according to them, it is only right for Petronas to give 15% extra
oil royalty to Sabah.
Can it be done? Is it even
doable? Let’s explore the realities.
While the following example
will not be able to capture every essence of all the JV partnerships Petronas
entered into, none the less, it is suffice to give a fair view of what the
realities are on the ground.
The illustrations below
explain how much Petronas makes from Sabah oil.
For every RM100 revenue
derived from Sabah oil, 5% goes to the state’s coffer while another 5% to the
Federal coffer. Approximately 45% goes into recovery cost, and the remaining
45% goes to the joint venture’s gross profit.
In the end, it is clear that
Petronas’ profit, after splitting revenue with others and after paying taxes,
is only around 16.74%. If Petronas is asked to pay up the extra 15% from its
profit margin, this will effectively render them unable to pay their overheads,
financial commitments and re-investment for future income. The end result is
financial blow which may lead to bankruptcy!
If Petronas is unable to pay
without jeopardizing its very existence, where would the additional 15% come
from then? Obviously there are two other choices left; the PSC partner or the
federal government.
It is very unlikely for the
PSC partner to give up what was already agreed in the contract between them and
Petronas. Furthermore, lower profit percentage would make oil exploration in
Malaysia unattractive to them.
If the joint venture
partners refuse jobs in Malaysia, we will not be able to extract our oil in an
economically viable manner. This may lead to a serious energy security problem
for Malaysia: with no one extracting oil, we may end up importing all of our
energy requirement!
With Petronas and its joint
venture partners unable to commit the extra 15% (or about RM12.5 billion) to
the oil producing states of Sabah, Sarawak and Trengganu, the toher option is
of course to take it from the federal government which receives dividend around
RM30 billion annually from Petronas.
This option is not without
its own ramifications.
With reduced dividend from
Petronas, the federal government will have less money for its development
budget. This means there will be less public spending on subsidies, schools,
hospitals, police stations, roads and other infrastructures. Obviously, the
most impacted would be the non-oil producing states.
Anwar Ibrahim must have the
moral courage to inform the non-oil producing states that as a Prime Minister, he
will cut their federal allocated budgets by RM12.5 billion. Unfortunately this
is not happening.
The last option available to
Anwar Ibrahim is to increase Sabah’s oil royalty by 15% but in order to ensure
he has enough funds available for the rest of the country, he will have to cut
Sabah’s federal allocation. Remember, cutting Sabah’s federal allocation is
within his prerogative as a Prime Minister. This option is plausible given the
fact he has never given any assurances publically that he would not cut Sabah’s
federal allocation which, at the moment, is one of the highest among all the
states in Malaysia.
It is actually funny how
Anwar hardly shares the specifics of his promise of 15% increase in oil royalty
with the rest of the country. Perhaps he knows very well that he won't be able
to provide explanation for them. Apparently, keeping Malaysians in the dark
makes the illusion easier to perform. In fact, I remember asking opposition
members, including Anwar Ibrahim himself, in Parliament of the specifics but
instead of an answer, I got a blank response followed by sharp stares!
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT COLLECTS
MORE THAN IT SPENDS IN SABAH
This is yet another
irresponsible claim by the opposition to gain sympathy votes in Sabah. It is a
very powerful lie which if not countered factually, could result in deep
division and hatred towards the Barisan Nasional federal government.
Let's address this issue
objectively and see if it is true that the federal government has been taking
so much of Sabah's resources (including oil money) but giving back so little in
return.
The following
illustrations show what federal government collected in Sabah in 2011 and how
much it had spent in Sabah in the same year.
Contrary to lies spawned by
the opposition, the federal government actually spent more (by a whopping
RM4.736 billion) in Sabah in 2011 compared to what it collected in the same
year!
The statistics, which were
made available to me by Bahagian Analisa Cukai dan Bahagian Pengurusan
Belanjawan, Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia, went as far back as 2007 and had
breakdowns for each federal ministry.
It showed the same
consistent trend of federal government spending more in Sabah than what it
collected in each year. Nothing is more revealing than the truth and fact!
Statistics, in the end, don't lie.
For the year 2012 onwards,
there is no reason to believe the trend will reverse itself especially when
Dato Sri Najib Tun Razak has made it very clear that special emphasis will be
placed on Sabah's development under his economic transformation program.
Towards this, Barisan
Nasional Sabah is happy to note that to date, the Prime Minister has not disappointed
Sabahans.
No comments:
Post a Comment