KOTA KINABALU: Yayasan Islam
Sabah Secretary General, OKK Yahya Ahmad Shah has challenged Science,
Technology and Innovation Minister Datuk Seri Panglima Dr Maximus Ongkili and
Deputy Housing and Local Government Minister Datuk Seri Lajim Ukin to a public
debate on the 20 points.
The subjects are the 20
Points, The papers submitted – Inter-governmental committee, the Cobbold
Commission report and the Malaysia Agreement.
Yahya said the debate is at
any time and at any place.
“I am making this challenge
in order to have views from both sides to enable Sabahans to know the truth,”
he said in a statement yesterday.
Yahya said it was sad to
read from time to time that the issue of 20 points and other pre-Malaysia
documents were being brought up again and again, claiming that they are still
valid forever.
“These documents neither
valid from the beginning. These were guides for the formation of the Federation
of Malaysia,” he said.
“Datuk Seri Panglima Dr
Maximus Ongkili himself claimed that most of the points raised in the documents
were incorporated into the Malaysian Constitution or made into law to make them
legally effective.
“Therefore, the claims that
these documents are enforceable and valid themselves are just a political
gimmick. These were various findings or ideas. All these papers are now
historical documents,” he said in a statement yesterday.
Malaysia, according to
Yahya, is ruled by Parliamentary Democracy which everybody knows. Parliament
made the constitution and makes changes from time to time to comply with world
or nation requirements. The Constitution is supreme and Parliament is bound to
adhere to the legal interpretation of the Constitution. On the other hand, of
course Parliament can change the Constitution from time to time. This is very
rare.
“It is mentioned the spirit
of this and that. Surely the modern civilisation does not be guided by the
‘spirit’. The spirit had disappeared from the civilisation long time ago. When
the world was guided and ruled by ‘spirit’, at that time there were no
negotiated contracts, no double pricing, no leaders living beyond their means.
There is a big difference between the rule by ‘spirit’ and the rule by
civilisation,” he said.
Yahya added the point of 20
points had been over the last ten years mentioned by various leaders claiming
this and that.
“Actually if one look
carefully at the 20 points there is nothing there except the point that Sabah
cannot get out of Malaysia. Admittedly the implementation of the provision of
the Constitution, laws and policies allegedly is not very fair to Sabah. This
is also true when nearly RM1 billion will be spent in Semporna alone. These two
projects – the Bum Bum Bridge and the dual carriages are not priorities for
Sabah. There are many projects which are command priorities,” he said.
Yayasan Islam appeals to
those leaders to make a fair and just statement so that Sabahans will not be
taken for granted. With wrong information once will get wrong perception. (theborneopost)
This debate would surely clear the air.
ReplyDeletePastikan debat ini dianjurkan dengan lebih professional.
ReplyDeleteya, jika dibuat pastikan dibuat secara profesional dan bukan masing-masing mau jadi hero.
DeleteKenapa kerajaan persekutuan masih gagal menunaikan perjanjian 20 perkara?
ReplyDeleteAnother debate that can create many attention. Good luck!
ReplyDeletekalau dipolitikkan saja isu ni tapi tiada penyelesaian dan sekadar tunjuk siapa hero, memang tiada penghujung la isu ni.
ReplyDeleteya, harap isu ini tidak dipolitikkan oleh sesiapa pun.
DeleteNampaknya, debatlah yang paling terkenal sekarang ni. harap dapat capai satu kesepakatan penyelesaian.
ReplyDeleteHope its benefit to the public.
ReplyDeleteHope its not meant to prove themself.
ReplyDeleteBiarkan mereka yang faham dan arif dalam 20 perkara ini membincangkannya.
ReplyDeleteCabaran yang begitu bagus sekali membincangkan mengenai 20 perkara yang penting untuk penduduk Sabah.
ReplyDeleteini menunjukkan isu 20 pekara mendapat perhatian daripada banyak pihak.
Deletenampaknya banyk pula pihak yang mahu berdebat sekarang ini.
ReplyDeleteTidak payah la debat. Buang masa dan tenaga
Deleteapa pun, jika mahu berdebat pastikan ianya dijalankan secara matang dan profesional.
ReplyDeleteDebat mungkin kadang2 perlu. tapi tiada juga penyelesaian kecuali mempromosikan diri masing2.
ReplyDeletetidak perlulah Yayasan Islam masuk campur hal2 politik di negeri ini..
ReplyDelete