By : HAKIM JOE
SABAH possesses the largest
number of migrant workers in Malaysia, exceeding even Selangor. One simple
question, “Why would the poorest state in Malaysia have such a large number,
even to the extent of eclipsing the richest state in Malaysia”? Are there so
many ongoing projects in Sabah that the state requires so many migrant workers?
If yes, why is it still the poorest state in Malaysia?
As the name implies, this is
a clandestine project that involves the alleged citizenship drive to naturalize
illegal migrants for political purposes, which started in the 1990s, and was
targeted against the two East Malaysian states, especially Sabah.
By introducing new elements
into the concoction, one adulterates its overall effect and by integrating
migrant Muslims from Indonesia and the Philippines into Sabah as Malaysian
citizens, it dilutes the concentration of the indigenous people there. By the
same token, this does not automatically mean that these new migrants will vote
BN but the odds are pretty high that they will and it is a risk worth taking.
The population of Sabah in
the early 70s was about 655,000 and the major ethnic groups comprise of 32%
Kadazan/Dusun, 23% Chinese and 4.9% Muruts (total 59.9%). These are majority
non-Muslims but either Christians or Buddhists. Henceforth, should Umno set up
its branches in Sabah during the 70s, they will be in the minority as Malay
Muslims only made up 0.4% and Bajaus (also Muslims) made up 13.1% of the Sabah
populace (total 13.5%). Lousy odds.
Fast forward it to 2006 and
the demographics have been utterly distorted. The ethnic composition of
Sabahans are now 17.8% Kadazan/Dusun, 9.6% Chinese and 3.3% Muruts (total 29.7%)
whereas Malay Muslims increased to 11.5%, Bajaus increased to 13.4% and “Other
Bumiputras” comprised of 14.6% respectively (total 44.5%).
What and who the Hell are
“Other Bumiputras” anyway? Let’s not even get into how these new migrants are
accorded Bumiputra statuses whilst non-Muslims that have been here for a couple
of generations are deemed second class citizens.
In a normal society, the
number of the majority ethnic group will increase in tandem with the population
increase. Since the Kadazan/Dusun were prominent back in the 60s and 70s
comprising 32% of Sabahans, this ethnic group should make up approximately 40%
to 45% of Sabah’s population in the 90s. However, this is not what actually
transpired. In fact the number of ethnic Kadazan/Dusun almost halved from 32%
to only 17.8%.
Sabah’s population increased
to 1,307,582 in 1980; 1,736,902 in 1991; 2,449,389 in 2000 and 3.21 million in
2010 making it the state with the highest population growth rate at 3.1%
compared to the national average of 2.3%. As per indicated in the previous
paragraph, the total number of Kadazan/Dusun declined drastically. Does this
mean that the majority of Kadazan/Dusuns in Sabah owns VCD & DVD players
whereas most of the Malay-Muslims do not (hence finding other nocturnal
activities to entertain themselves)?
Project IC or “Project M” is
an ominous long term plan to modify the demographic pattern of Sabah to make it
more favorable to the ruling government and certain political parties,
especially with regards to changing the electoral voting patterns. In West
Malaysia, we have frogs and gerrymandering.
In East Malaysia, we
covertly change the demographics. It is therefore not surprising that Umno
calls both Sabah and Sarawak their “fixed deposits” as in “you will still vote
for us regardless of how we abuse and mistreat you.” Example, Sabah was the
second richest state after Selangor in 1970. Now it is the poorest state. Even
Perlis with only 317 square miles of real estate to call its own and without a
single drop of oil in its soil is richer than Sabah.
Any Sabahans out there? Does
reading this makes you want to puke?
Let’s discuss migrant
workers now before going on to Project IC. Sabah possesses the largest number
of migrant workers in Malaysia, exceeding even Selangor. One simple question,
“Why would the poorest state in Malaysia have such a large number, even to the
extent of eclipsing the richest state in Malaysia”? Are there so many ongoing
projects in Sabah that the state requires so many migrant workers? If yes, why
is it still the poorest state in Malaysia?
When asked, the top official
of the federal Ministry for Women, Family and Community,Dato Dr. Noorul Ainur
Mohd Nur said that 27.7% out of the 3.21 million in Sabah comprised of migrant
workers with a large majority of them being Indonesians. Furthermore, the
immigrant population in the Kinabatangan district in 2010 has already surpassed
the local population (73.8% immigrants & 26.2% locals). What this basically
means is that there are more Indonesians and Filipinos in a Malaysian district,
on Malaysian soil, than Malaysians.
In the 70s, there was no
such thing as migrant workers in Sabah. Nowadays they make up more than a
quarter of Sabah’s population. In an earlier interview, TDM said that these
migrant workers, regardless of whether they overstayed or entered the country
illegally, qualify for Malaysian citizenship “if they spoke Bahasa Malaysia”.
Does this mean that nothing else really mattered except for the mastery of the
language? Does this mean that a convicted murderer or child molester qualifies
for Malaysian citizenship should he or she is capable of speaking fluent Bahasa
Malaysia?
So, how could anyone get
away with it unless it has been sanctioned from up above? An illegal immigrant
would first need his history cleansed and that involves the Immigration
Department. Then he needs to be “made” a citizen and that involves the National
Registration Department. Finally, he needs to register as a voter and that
involves the Election Commission. Fortunately (for someone), only one ministry
is involved as the Immigration Department, the National Registration Department
and the Election Commission all comes under the purview of the Ministry of Home
Affairs.
If the government of
Malaysia is allegedly giving citizenship to anyone who spoke fluent Bahasa
Malaysia, then hypothetically there should then be a mixture of Muslims,
Buddhists, Christians, Hindus, Hare Krishnas and atheists coming in from all
around the world. How then does one justify that only the majority of these
immigrants are all Muslims from Indonesia and the Philippines?
This is however purely a
conjecture as the NRD would not confirm or deny it. Hell, they even said in
advance that they would consider not attending any Parliamentary Select Committee
if indeed the department were called upon to testify. Basically, it is a subtle
way of telling the Sabahans to fuck off. Additionally, the NRD would seriously
only consider attending if a Royal Commission of Inquiry is initiated, that is
if the RCI really happens.
Should all Sabahans take it
as it is? Certainly not! Are all Sabahans taking it as it is? Absolutely so!
Sometimes I wonder if you people across the straits have your head properly
screwed in. Don’t blame the West Malaysians. We delivered five states in the
last general elections (it is just that they took one back no thanks to the
Jelapang female dog). Five out of eleven over here is not too shabby. Zero out
of two across the sea definitely is.
Anyway, the RCI failed to
materialize but in 2007 a PSC was initiated to investigate the existence and
functions of Project IC. Bernard Dompok was selected as its chairman but he
soon quit as the NRD lived up on its promise and informed everybody that the
department will not be appearing before the PSC.
On the first of June this
year, our dearly beloved PM announced that the federal government has (finally)
agreed to set up a RCI to investigate problems related to illegal immigration
in Sabah. Then nothing happened until Tuaran MP Datuk Seri Wilfred Mojilip
Bumburing, formerly UPKO’s Deputy President, Beaufort MP Datuk Seri Lajim Ukin,
formerly an Umno supreme council member and Senator Datuk Maijol Mahap, a
Vice-President in BN’s Sabah-based United Pasokmomogun Kadazandusun Murut
Organisation (UPKO) defected from BN’s fold. Suddenly the federal government
officially announced the formation of the RCI including the members of the
commission and the Terms of References. Now we wait (again).
Anyway, the members of the
commission include Steve Shim (Chairman), a former Chief Judge of Sabah and
Sarawak; Saripuddin Kasim (Secretary), the Secretary General of the Domestic
Trade, Cooperatives and Consumerism Ministry; Kamaruzaman Ampon (Commissioner)
the vice-chancellor of Universiti Malaysia Sabah; Herman Luping (Commissioner)
the former Sabah State Attorney General; KY Mustafa (Commissioner) the former
Sabah State Secretary; and Henry Chin Poy Wu (Commissioner) the deputy chairman
of the Malaysian Crime Prevention Foundation.
The eight Terms of References
include:
1) To investigate the number
of foreigners in Sabah given blue Malaysian ICs or citizenships;
2) To investigate if the
award of such ICs or citizenships were according to the law;
3) To investigate if those
given blue ICs, temporary identification receipts or citizenships through
unlawful means have been registered in Sabah’s electoral roll;
4) To investigate if the
authorities have taken any action or made improvements to standard operating
procedures (SOPs), methods and regulations to prevent any
irregularities in accordance
with the law;
5) To conduct a deeper probe
into the SOPs, methods and regulations on the award of blue ICs or citizenships
to foreigners in Sabah by taking into consideration international norms and
standards that are applicable to Malaysia, and to recommend amendments or
changes to improve current practices;
6) To investigate the
reasons behind Sabah’s population growth according to the following categories:
a) Sabah citizens residing in the state,
including those given blue ICs or citizenships through birth certificates (late
registration);
b) foreign workers (including family members);
c) illegal immigrants (including family
members); and
d) fugitives
and to study their impact on the number of
those registered in the electoral roll;
7) To investigate the social
implications on the Sabah community following the award of blue ICs or
citizenships to foreigners in the state; and
8) To investigate the number
of “stateless” foreigners in Sabah given blue Identity Cards or citizenships.
In conclusion, Project IC or
otherwise known as “Project M” first begun in the early nineties when Umno
decided that they are unable to depend on Sabahan politicians to win their
elections for BN. United Sabah National Organization (USNO) was formed as a
result of this long term planning and later BERJAYA took over the reins to
spearhead BN’s charge to take total control of the state by means of mass
immigration and migrant naturalization processes.
Between 1970 and 2000,
Sabah’s population increased by 285%, whilst Malaysia's population increased by
only 113%. Furthermore, the Kadazan/Dusun/Murut people
increased by 236% as
compared to the increase of “Other Bumiputras” by a whopping 631%.
Fact: “Senior citizens (in
Sabah) who lose their MyKads are given the MyPR as replacement”…as quoted by
NRD Kota Kinabalu.
Fact: Senior citizens in
Sabah who has to mandatory change their blue ICs (to MyKads) will sometimes be
given the MyPR as replacement. NRD Kota Kinabalu fails to specify under what
circumstances or situation will this occur.
Fact: 65,000 Filipino
refugees were issued the IMM13 refugee documents in the 1970s.
Fact: In 2008, the federal
government stated that 65,000 Filipino refugees were again issued the IMM13
refugee documents that year (coincident?)
Fact: Children of
intermarriages between local natives are classified as sino-indigenous and not
indigenous people. However, children of marriages between “Other Bumiputras”
and foreigners are automatically Bumiputras.
Fact: Any foreigner qualifies
for the MyKad if he or she exhibit mastery of Bahasa Malaysia.
These foreigners should
however show evidence that they qualify to be classified under the “Other
Bumiputra” category first…
If Malaysians of Chinese
descent who is born here are called Pendatangs, what do you call those who were
born elsewhere but just obtained their MyKads because they can speak BM?
Kita cuma harapkan yang mana isu PATI dan Projek IC ini akan dapat diselesaikan.
ReplyDeleteHarap2 masalah PATI di Sabah dapat diselesaikan.
DeleteSebelum ini pelbagai usaha telah dilakukan bagi menangani isu PATI di Sabah ini. Sekarang kemunculan RCI untuk PATI ini memberikan kegembiraan kepada penduduk Sabah dan sebagai hadiah daripada kerajaan.
ReplyDeleteRCI sudah lama dituntut oleh rakyat sabah..akhirnya ianya ditunaikan pada masa najib sebagai PM..
Deletedulu semasa Anwar jadi TPM, Pairin ada mencadangkan penubuhan RCI, tapi Anwar menolaknya.
DeleteDatuk Najib has announced the formation of an RCI panel during his visit to Sabah last Saturday, the panel will be given 6 months time frame to investigate those who are suspected to be involved in the Project IC issue.
ReplyDeletemungkin mahathir perlu ditanya mengapa pada era pemerintahan beliau, RCI sama sekali tidak diendahkan dan ditolak..
DeleteRakyat Sabah mahu masalah PATI tu diselesaikan secepat mungkin.
ReplyDeleteSekiranya ada kerjasama pasti akan boleh selesai.
DeleteHope that the RCI panel will successfully discover the truth of the project IC and make recommendation to the government on the best action to be taken against those who are guilty. We should let the do their jobs and wait for the results.
ReplyDeletehope RCI is not just another political gimmick...
ReplyDeleteberharap proses menyediakan terma rujukan untuk RCI boleh diterima oleh semua
ReplyDeleteThe RCI should also probe the extent of political interference in dealing with the illegal immigrant phenomenon in Sabah.
ReplyDeletesemoga usaha kerajaan menangani masalah PATI/projek IC/kerakyatan songsang berjaya
ReplyDeletedan semoga RCI ini dapat dilaksanakan dengan jayanya
ReplyDeleteKerjasama semua masyarakat perlu untuk menjayakan RCI
Deletekebanjiran pendatang asing di negeri ini membuktikan bahawa negeri ini tidaklah miskin, malah mempunyai banyak peluang2 pekerjaan yang tidak dimanfaatkan oleh rakyat sabah sendiri..
ReplyDeleteberkenaan dengan pendatang asing/haram, rakyat Sabah juga harus dipersalahkan.. kenapa perlu bagi mereka pekerjaan, kenapa perlu sediakan tempat tinggal untuk mereka, kenapa perlu beli barangan yang mereka jual,??
ReplyDeletekerajaan tidak berpeluk tubuh berkenaan dengan isu PATI di negeri ini.. malah kerajaan telah menubuhkan jawatankuasa pusat dan jawatankuasa negeri, dan sebelum ini kerajaan juga menubuhkan program 5P disamping usaha2 berterusan oleh pihak imigresen, polis dan penguatkuasa marin.. kini kerajaan tubuhkan pula RCI untuk menangani masalah ini..
ReplyDeleteMenuding jari menuduh pihak tertentu menyebabkan kebanjiran PATI di Sabah tidak menyelesaikan masalah. Apa faktor utama mereka ke Sabah dan bagaimana mereka masuk ke negeri ini? Kenapa golongan mereka yang akan mengisi kekosongan kerja di sektor perladangan dan buruh pembinaan? Kadang2 sikap orang tempatan sendiri yang menyebabkan kebanjiran PATI di Sabah.
ReplyDelete